HEY LOOK! 2 years later, and you are all STILL stupid! :D

:D

I was far more patient in 2014. Questions as dumb as Derek Moran's will get you banned/blocked these days! :D

Holy CLUELESS FUCKS, BATMAN! That was a painful read.

Wow! I can say now, I am still stupid, but I SO get this thread nowadays. It's in my fucking bones now!

Ho! How did Philip LaForeret not end up in the Gail Marie and Sewer bin? He's another liar

"Holy CLULESS FUCKS, BATMAN! That was a painful read." Yes. Wow. Yes. :/

Should I re-read it ? :(

Yes, re-read Scott Duncan only, obviously. Trust me, but verify! PS: I like you better now! :D

HAHAHA!!! :D

I could no longer handle reading his comments and had to finally block him to make reading flow smoother. He thinks he is part of the clubhouse AND he thinks they are going to let him in and show him fairness and justice because he can quote their rules. Painful, and it makes my head hurt just seeing his name. What couldn't that man get?

But what about what Scott had to share? Did you "get it"? :/ Fuck anyone else. Scott gave fucking gold here, as always.

Yes, Anibal. I see the gold. I am studying and using the dictionary to reprogram the old OS. It takes me a bit as this old brain has a lot deep files of bullshit programming. Sometimes it hurts so bad that I have to get away and THINK about what I have just read and then come back and read it again with new eyes that replaces the bullshit "in the library of my ass" as you all call it. Painful, very painful, but it also means that you can teach an old dog new tricks. Persistence and repetition.

So, you see the gold? Like, which part?

I don't miss Derek. :D

They didn't called me BELLIGERENT last friday. They've threatened me to expulse me from the court. I think the judge knew that I know :D

They never called belligerent either

For an hour and a half, they were waiting for see to say ONE wrong word. And that would have be it. I would have been arrested.... This part was the most difficult, staying sure to not use a wrong statement or word. At one point, near the end, I said: IT IS BOVIOUS TO ME THAT I AM GETTING "FUCKED" IN HERE.

I used the word FUCKED (Fourr� in French) NO ONE OBJECTED..... :/

That was TRUE, I was getting FUCKED in there.....that is the TRUTH.

But Scott Duncan warned me many times..... :)

#ItsOKtoKillThem

Now you know why. Killing "justice officials" harms a society in NO WAY. NONE. Now you know why.

Well belligerence is for the sovereign. But my understanding is that you are there in the capacity of AGENT, as administrator. So I do not know if an agent can be considered belligerent.

I was there as Pierre, the man who possesses a juridical personality.

LIEN YOUR NAME!

A notice of mistake was filed, with an affidavit and the bc.

There's still another case to take care of, Scott...

But with what happened las friday, I have, indeed, ALL the good reasons to LIEN my name. Because OBVIOUSLY, they will LIE and LIE and LIE and LIE.... :/

Reading again. Anibal, and I see that ME has to start seeing everything as visa versa and ME has to start being the fucking KING. YES, I said, KING, because who the fuck wants to be the QUEEN! In court you are the ONLY one with STANDING. Me DEPOSITS the YOU and then they OFFER ME the VISA VERSA of what I have been PROGRAMMED to believe (ALL BELIEF IS EVIL)! We hang ourselves for lack of knowledge of the WORDS that we have been programmed with because there are no SYNONYMS.

I have 100% TRUST in Rogue Support and/or Aquilae TRUST, just saying :D No jokes :P

Oh, and Tara Duncan too :D

One that is hostile or aggressive, especially one that is engaged in war.

A belligerent is someone who won't bend over when being agressed...... He won't START the fight, but when someone jump on him, he will stand up and face the music...... ;) Natasha Tutino

yep copy pasted far far ;) I have understood INTENT and how important it is throughout allllll of this. The more I see, the more I can't help but see a masterpiece of linguistic art lololol

I have been called the "William Shakespeare" of trash talk! :D

...or is that not where you were going with that? :/

580 something comments....and that's where the gold always is. Great way to deprogram laziness. EXACTLY where I was going

the 'arts degree' gains more and more meaning lolololool

Their "art" is lying.

Yes.

Love reading the random changes in definitions.

I have the same "Arts degree" as they do. They can't lie to me.

You passed 2 bars, yes?

No. I passed NO bar.

When called to the Bar, I responded "why"?

:D

please go on

It was beyond their comprehension that someone would study law, and NOT become a lawyer. As I said before; NOBODY drops out of law school because it's "hard". It isn't. It's memory and recitation. The whole myth about "Law degrees are so hard to get", is a myth PAID FOR by the Law Society. Ever notice that EVERY lawyer you meet is stupid? HOW? How can they be stupid? Don't you have to be "smart" to get a law degree? NO! In fact it's SO easy I studied computer science and medicine too! You paid for it, too! :D

Of all the things that I have paid for; I would say today that THAT ONE ended up being an investment :)

Ren� L�vesque did the same, he never answered the call :D

annnd *slow clap*

WHY do you think Ren� L�vesque didn't answered that CALL? :D WHY Ren� L�vesque didn't want to become a LAWYER? :D

Hey Pete I put my Rene Tshirt to the test; a man of about 65 noticed pointed at me with surprise (I guess because I'm 'young' to be wearing rene on my shirt) and said 'That man. He was the best.' boom. proof of concept. lead right into pirate party. was just missing a pin to give and and to take a selfie and post lolol we have this little idea about 'spreading the word' to those not using any social media online.

This man wanted to SERVE us, and he knew that if he would have answered that call, it wouldn't be possible to SERVE, after.... :P

Because he understood what the fuck him joining the law society implied and understood it WAS WRONG.

As I was typing hahaha

It being wrong meant, as you said, he could no longer SERVE.

Cause there is this thing about right and wrong and how it can make you feel and well....any normal fucking human being should UNDERSTAND that lawyers are evil.

I miss Jacques Parizeau :((

Lol :D

The Bronfman family too :D

"Its was beings the Niggers and Jews is why we can't separates" <---OFFICIAL Frenglish translation! :D

COME BACK JACQUES!

"Its was beings the Niggers and Jews is why we can't separates" <---OFFICIAL Frenglish translation! :D FFS pete *shaking my mo-fucking head laughing my ass off* bwahahaha

Ren� L�vesque was NOT as fun as Jacques! He just wasn't!

Pete can you tell me: have any 'separatists' brought up the financial reasons why it is advantageous to split? Like the numbers in the fucking face type of info? I was too young and studying too much right now to start going through videos of those years. lolol

SURETY and ACCOUNTING :D

Ren� L�vesque was NOT as fun as Jacques! He just wasn't!: please elaborate: I come from the generation of 'liberals' that were brainwashed by media convincing us he was garbage and I just didn't give a fuck cause 'prgramming' lol

Pete Daoust is starting to think right and value the right thigs.

This ALSO means he's starting to grasp some of what was STOLEN from him.

...and YOU.

It hurts already. And I am NOWHERE near Pete's level.

Yes. You aren't qualified to have an opinion on the matter. :P

...ask Pete. He can confirm this :D

Fact. I'm already hurt by the stupid shit programming which shows what they purposely kept from us in terms of knowledge. I can't imagine the anger many of you feel, the hate.

And I'm not qualified to have an opinion on the matter. lolol true story

I would ask Pete but he has 'You aren't qualified to be asking." all over his fucking bio. bwahha :P

I could kill a lawyer's family in front of him/her and feel NOTHING, except the tiny consolation that I have made the world a tiny bit better. YOU might think "Their family is innocent". No. No they aren't. They are PETS that fed off of YOUR LABOUR. They think it's their RIGHT. The Law Society CLAIMS TO OWN YOU. NEVER FORGET THAT! THE LAW SOCIETY CLAIMS OWNERSHIP OF ALL "INDIVIDUALS".

Remember: ONLY LEGAL DEFINITIONS APPLY!

Scott Duncan "You totally played that in your head! ADMIT IT! :P" I did. lol

I really hate that I wasted so much time with Derek Moran. These days, ALL of Derek's questions are answered with "NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS, DEREK"!

And NO SURETY.

YOU might think "Their family is innocent". No. No they aren't. They are PETS that fed off of YOUR LABOUR." - YES. Climbing that hurdle step by step. That's a tough one for me as a woman. But the more I dig deeper into this, the less 'empathetic' I feel.

'pathetic'

#ScottisAlwaysRight

#ScottIsAlwaysRight Seriously, at least make a EFFORT to get it right!

These days you have to PAY to be called to the Bar. I'm directly responsible for that. :D

Otherwise, it's ALL ACCOUNTING!

This guy, Paul Leblond, he was there friday. He called me about 5 times since friday, he is SHOCKED......he came here at my place after the hearing, I showed him the WHOLE case.... I showed him EVERYTHING I have done with City of Terrebonne......He is just fucking shook to the core.... He was there, and really focused on what happened friday, he just can't believe it..... :D

That guy is fighting the system for 5 years now. I taught him SURETY and ACCOUNTING two months ago. He doesn't sleep since :D

It's SO hard to say this without sounding condescending, so I apologize in advance! I'm proud of you. You are BETTER than your peers, and you make a REAL difference. Time will surely show this to be true. While you observe Mr. Leblond's reactions, you already know you are on the RIGHT side. You can't be on the RIGHT side, unless you think right, and value the right things (or implicitly trust someone who does). It's a burden, but it's worth it. You are now more than you were. The possibilities are ENDLESS.

They grow up so fast.

Indeed.

Why just a few years ago we were trying to determine what the fuck he was saying....never mind, that hasn't changed :D

Indeed.

HAHAHAHAHA!!!! :D

Hahahaha!

...this post is from 2013! I was debating how to abuse my new powers way back then.

I was learning French :P

How's that coming along? I can't tell :P

SURETY AND ACCOUNTING. Why is it that NOWHERE ELSE ON THE WHOLE FUCKING INTERNET says this? Think about it.

You KNOW it's TRUE, so why am I the ONLY MAN out of the BILLIONS on the Internet, who says it?

"Secret maritime lien" Secret between who?

Look it up

Pete Daoust: "I was learning French :P" Scott Duncan: "How's that coming along? I can't tell :P" This is still making me laugh :D

Holy SHIT dude! You're really going to do it.

It's me. I like to think big.

I was going to ask for more but I knew you'd offer it up...

You wanna fuck me now, don'tcha? :P

And I knew that was coming...

Jesus Christ. They used to put up a fight 20 years ago! I swear nothing changes with you.

The question still stands.

Is this could happen only when you are in the defendant position ??

You aren't part of the club, pierre. They ALWAYS view you as a DEFENDANT... THEY'RE ATTACKING YOU.

DEFEND...DEFENDant Get it?

I just got up for a piss Scott Ill go back to sleep in 5 minutes no worries....

WHY do i need this information again?

Got it

Beverly May Braaksma, the question remains unanswered :P

seems to me there is some kind of presumption...

Gee can you vague that up a little?

You should go by "shit disturber" :D

OMG he's already locked on. You poor girl. :( Where's that "Fiona Munro"? I happen to know his targeting system is buggy when there are multiple targets in range of his influence! Evade while you still can!

I'm more focused than I was in my 20's. Your data is old.

lol... I'm not twenty either... nite

You have to become that to secure your right in Court :)

Fuk...is this a star wars scene or something ???

I'd like to call bullshit please. You are male, after all. You get only one thought process. Women get up to 9 at once. You can't track two, and maintain focus. You don't have the brain parts.

Google "cooperative multitasking", and just give up. It's me.

Fuck.

Fiona Munro my Lust! YES! And the PROPER (We must be "proper") response is: BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO YOU DECLARE WAR ON MY PERSON!

Not the Courts rights....., not the prosecution rights ...your rights ! ;)

YAY! Let's fuck to celebrate!

If she goes for it, I'm just going to shoot myself in the head with a nail gun.

;)p

You been cheating on me....... with Beverly...Scott...... :(

Just settin' up a threesome. Good wholesome fun (For me). No "Cheating".

JESUS Christ. Where's my nail gun?

LOL!

I have no nail guns either

Lemme guess...midnight dump?

Et voila...

I'm in top form tonight. :D

Frightening to behold. This thread is gold.

You want details ??

This thread is gold, FOR NOW. It appears Pierre Daoust is about to take a dump on it...

No no I never do that kind of stuff

Kate Butler, if I make another few thousand of these "GOLD threads, can you crochet me a scarf with them? :D

;)... "Ow Ah dunnae kinn.....If Ah coods dae somethin' loch 'at !

Women just do everything for you, don't they?

You need YARN to crochet, but I can Tat with thread! :p

NOW WE'RE TALKIN!

Och aye alrecht but it has tae be anither cheil !

OMG, who's THIS? Either you are a "damsel in distress" or you have a 12 metre lethal range. Which is it?

Ok please now...!!!!!!

Do I need to smoke a joint to follow here ????

Little from column A, and a little from column B. ;) She, her VERY significant Other, and I are warming up for the next step in the KANSAS CITY SHUFFLE. ;)

Fuck. I HATE that dance. :(

Kate Butler, just trust him. The KANSAS CITY SHUFFLE is a scary "dance", but you have the best teacher on the planet. ;)

Thanks for the ringing endorsement. Get your Nail Gun ready ;)

Fiona! RUN!

Pfft, that one's hooked and hangin' off the side of the boat. :P

Ill get my shotgun out if this continu....

Those translators suck, don't they ;)

It's even weirder in English! :D

You dont even wanna know..

Fiona are you still here?

They translate as good as I play bowling

She is sleeping now

And on that note, I think I'll head back to bed

Rigth beside me..:)

Me too...!!!!..HAHAHA!!

...and as usual, I'm the last man standing. :P

THE GOOD GUYS DON'T HIDE, PEOPLE! REMEMBER THAT!

You say thats- "the proper response"..whats that the proper response TOO? As you say- "There's a catch; you MUST wait for them to offer it."...What is it that the court/judge has to say first, for you to come back with that line you used?

Agree 100%...

They "declare 'YOU'" belligerent. Look for the WORD "belligerent". When they USE it, they are accepting your Sovereignty.

How will they respond to "By what authority do you make war on my person"?

That's not a rhetorical question, everyone!

So you go into court, with the intent of acting like a bit-of-a-dick, baiting them almost, until they 'declare you a belligerent,' which springs the trap back on themself, in which at that time you say- "By what authority do you make war on my person"?...hmmmmmmm, interesting

..thinking

*Jeopardy Music*

LMAO

You totally played that in your head! ADMIT IT! :P

The Judge gets up, bows, and leaves the court...?

FUCK, no. I'll INVADE.

*Jeopardy Music (extended mix)*

They respond with what person is that?.. you answer- Grantor, sole-living-Beneficiary and Lawful Holder In Due Course?

Who's they? That doesn't really answer the question posed to the court, Doctor Lexus :P

they = court/judge

http://youtu.be/qkPGlVqqEP0

WOW! That's like every answer people give to your questions. :(

"Why come you don't have a tattoo" is probably the last words I'll here before some idiot shoots me.

"By what authority do you make war on my person?" is the equivalent to telling a cop who pulls you over in your car - "Not for hire," then the cop supposedly walks off.....thats your way of telling them your unscanable?

...well unless you WISH to be surety! :P

So what - you walk into court, give them THE NAME, they think they got you, then you just ask them.."Does the court consider me to be a belligerent defendant?"..and then hit them with your line?

The court/judge will then ask you- "Are you here as the man, or as the person?"

No. You only need to show that the NAME has "APPEARED". Then you ask questions. LOTS of questions! (NOTE:Canada Grade "A" Shit Disturbing can be had here) and just wait. You'll know when the time comes. They will engage you 3 times, to meet the burden of evidence. Then they disengage. DO NOT ACCEPT ANYTHING FROM THE COURT PAST THIS POINT AS IT IS TREATY FROM THAT POINT ON.

TREATY??

..does this have something to do with the Liber Code?

You DID look up belligerent, didn't you? What OTHER law exists between nations?

*Jeopardy Music -Extended Dance Mix*

*walks over to my Blacks Magic*

The reason I know as much as I do, is because my head isn't filled with shit I ASSUME I know. :P As I said, NONE of you knows what "belligerent" means. :P

belligerent = country, belligerency = nation

And what laws exist between nations?

admiralty/maritime?

*facepalm*

..is that synonym for slap?

Natives don't care about Canada breaking Maritime law, I assure you :P

Admiralty, then..

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oAfd6t1wQJ0/UHRWSKeum8I/AAAAAAAAHRY/VhbHnfZCazA/s1600/picard-facepalm.jpg

LOL

The Law of Nations?

Derek Moran, you really aren't that dumb. I'll dumb it down. What does the T in NATO stand for?

THE ONLY LAWS BETWEEN NATIONS ARE TREATIES!

Treaty

Thank you, Derek. That was painful. Are you covering for Pierre?

LMAO

..yes, but im not deliberately trying to do it

I don't believe you.

"By what authority do you make war on my person?"... then the court will come back as you alluded to earlier, with.......?

Who is coming back? There has to be a PERSON behind a war declaration. Who declared it?

Is there some Treaty between us and the courts that you only know about?...your theory implies theres a Treaty between us and the court in place not to make war against each other

WHO ARE YOU TALKING TO? The declarer of the war? Who is that?

No treaty if you don't accept. Ask the Moors! :P

"By what authority do you make war on my person?'...then you asked awhile back in the thread- "What do you think the courts response will be to that?"..im still hung-up on that point

You are clearly caught up in all my awesomeness. RE-READ this thread. ;)

Yes.. this clearly deserves at least a lap-dance for you at The Brass Rail once i got this straight in my head

Dude, this thread ALONE is a high-end call-girl, MINIMUM! >:P

Im unemployed right now- so that high-end-call-girl better accept a Consumer Note-Purchase..

http://youtu.be/K_JIg9NB47M

LOL..yeah, thanks for that

It's a gift.

"They will engage you 3 times, to meet the burden of evidence." - so you have to ask them three times, "By what authority do you make war on my person?".....?

They'll make you. If you mean it, you won't let them move forward without an answer to the question.

That was a gift.. i got to see Dr. Demento again

*drumroll*

..and that answer is?

YOU ARE FREE TO GO!

"Where can i get some Marijuana cookies?".....actually, i have an answer to that question :0

LMFAO..are you kidding me??...this system has got some fucked-up sense of weird-distorted fair-play

There is NO PERSON behind the declaration. It goes from "LEGAL DECLARATION OF WAR" to "Derek Moran is a poopie-head" written on a bathroom stall, in terms of legal authority.

But a person is a corporation?..ultimately thats who is taking you to court isnt it?...so in that sense, there IS a person behind the declaration

THE COURT IS NOT A PERSON.

A HOCKEY RINK IS NOT A PERSON

So Bill Thornton is wrong then when he says always go into court as the Plaintiff.....it doesnt matter if you are the defendant?

The bathroom stall with "Derek Moran is a poopie-head" written on it, is NOT A PERSON

I LOVE being the defendant. For 20 years I was PRO SE. If you know the rules you have ALL the power. The system is corrupt now. They are unworthy of TRUST. When it was functional, I ALWAYS won. PRO SE!

bathroom stall = the court, and Derek Moran as opposed to DEREK MORAN is a poopie-head(id prefer- "likes black girls"), Derek Moran = no longer viewed as DEREK MORAN

Do you do this for money, even though you're not part of the B.A.R.?

NEVER!

I WILL NOT PRACTICE LAW

Why WOULD you practice law.....does anyone pay money to go see the Blue Jays PRACTICE?

You ever been in a situation where you start to wonder yourself in court- "Whens this judge gonna ask me if im a belligerent defendant?"

For the same reason you pay a doctor. :P

Casey Hill will spar for hours. The guy's a machine.

What happens if you're TOO belligerent and they cite you for contempt-of-court?

You still don't get it. How can you be TOO "engaged in war with another nation". It's like pregnancy; You either ARE or you AREN'T.

Contempt of court? Civil or criminal?

Well if he warns you "Ill cite you for contempt"..can you ask- "Do you consider me to be a belligerent defendant?"

I dont know the difference..

You can ask if you can fuck his daughter if you wish. I don't own you :P

QUESTIONS negate the possibility of presumed UNDERSTANDING.

"By what authority do you declare war on my person?".....is this something you can ask say the City of Toronto lawyer hasslin' my dad over some by-law bullshit?

So theres really no fear then in going into court and CONTRACTING with them by giving them THE NAME, cuz you can get out of it later?

You ARE contracting them. WAR DEVOLVES CONTRACT.

Contempt of court? Civil or criminal?

WHOA.. when they ask for THE NAME, i give it to them, its the complete opposite of what everybody is thinking, in that, im not contracting with THEM..they are contracting with ME??

Yes. Learn what a TENDER is. :P

theres a guy named Pete from privatis.me who was saying on his show that there s a way to get the courts to see you as the man and not the person..now i see what he was talkin' about

YOU are OFFERING your NAME in RESPONSE (respondent) to the TENDER of LEGAL SERVICES they OFFER.

Like this dickhead-security-guard from the other night wanting my name- "Umm, are you asking me for the name of the man, or, the name of the person?"..that fucked-him-up, he didnt know what i was talking about

Contempt of court. You keep mentioning it, and I asked Civil or criminal?

yeah, i dont know the difference/significance of that

Am I being "threatened" with CIVIL contempt? Am I being "threatened" with CRIMINAL contempt?

..rhetorical questions?

You're kinda like The Joker i realized- "Im just ahead of the CURVE.."

"dont know the difference/significance of that" - *facepalm* I could have saved a lot of preparation by saying "No Derek, you poopie-head, I'm not afraid of the made up thing you are asking about". :P

I read the poopie-head thing on a bathroom stall somewhere...

Seemed legit.

You were mistaken, it read- "Scott Duncan had a 19 year head-start on me"

Pfft... you kids and yer fancy lawyer-speak :P

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnOLhXmhkyA

I can relate...